Global Responsibility

Archives

  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • August 2011

Categories

  • Blog
Subscribe
Global Responsibility
Global Responsibility
  • Visit GRLI Website
  • Blog

Commentary on the first session of the 3rd PRME Global Forum: PART 2

  • 17 June 2012
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

Phytoplankton off the New Zealand coastline. Source: NASA Earth ObservatoryFollowing a brief overview on the first session of the PRME Global Forum in our previous post, we feel it prudent to describe our concerns in more detail and less frivolity.

In short, we’re disappointed, frustrated, even annoyed. While the merry-go-round of mutual congratulations continue the world is going to hell — just as it had been the last time we gathered in Rio.

During the first session we witnessed yet another anonymous procession of academics on a formal stage, quietly perching in single square aluminium and leather trim seats. We gamely watched the obligatory exchange of smiles, handshakes, a few token good news stories. Facts are rattled off, case studies blurted out, followed by automatic applause. There is a general feeling of comfort, of satisfaction. After all, we are a small community, an alliance amongst friends.

And yet nothing seems to have changed. We are card players hunched over a table, while the casino burns around us.

During the recess we speculated what would have happened had we brought a real outsider on to the stage — a no-nonsense economist — a representative from the old guard, perhaps even Keynes himself. Chances are that he would have laughed at our at our little gathering, dismissing our efforts as pipe dreams, the shrill yet ineffectual complaints from a few rabble rousers who evidently understand nothing of reality. Simply put, a few case studies listed in a glossy brochure will not change the current system of short-term profit .

Why are we still discussing our burning world? How did we resort to this cliché of circulatory speeches? How can a crisis of such magnitude be addressed in such comfortable terms? Just how bad do things need to get before the discussions cease, to be replaced by unified and sustained collaboration?

I think one of the problems lies in the insidious nature of the current social, economic and environmental crises we face today. The acidification of the oceans, for example, is a slow process that remains under the perceptual horizon. Similarly, few of us directly witness (much less understand) the ghastly poverty, the constant undermining of human rights, the vicious system of consumption and misery that accompanies most of us to our graves.

By contrast, an impending cometary impact is undeniable, unambiguous, and powerful enough to wipe out any number of species in a single devastating blow. A megavolcano, a passing rogue interstellar body or nearby a supernova would produce similar effects. The difference with such scenarios is that we currently do not possess the capability to avert such disasters.

And yet, we continue to dither around the problems we can solve, given enough sustained will and effort.

My feeling is that we will first need to encounter the disaster face to face (such as the clathrate gun, or a phytoplankton collapse) before reluctantly making a concerted effort to rebuild our society.

Total
0
Shares
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Previous Article
  • Blog

Commentary on the first session of the 3rd PRME Global Forum: PART 1

  • 16 June 2012
View Post
Next Article
  • Blog

Rio dialogues: Focus on water

  • 18 June 2012
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Blog

 Peter Møllgaard appointed chair of the GRLI

  • The GRLI
  • 15 July 2023
View Post
  • Blog

A message from our Chair

  • The GRLI
  • 9 December 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?

  • The GRLI
  • 12 October 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members

  • The GRLI
  • 26 June 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference

  • John North
  • 1 April 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Teaching Responsible Leadership, Moral Imagination and Stakeholder Dilemma Reconciliation:

  • The GRLI
  • 26 January 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Message from GRLI Foundation Chair Claire Maxwell

  • The GRLI
  • 21 December 2021
View Post
  • Blog

What Transformation Catalysts Do to Catalyze System Change

  • The GRLI
  • 24 November 2021
Featured Posts
  •  Peter Møllgaard appointed chair of the GRLI
    • 15 July 2023
  • A message from our Chair
    • 9 December 2022
  • Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?
    • 12 October 2022
  • A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members
    • 26 June 2022
  • Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference
    • 1 April 2022

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

The Global Responsibility blog hosted by the GRLI provides a record of the ongoing collaborative inquiry into the development of global responsibility in how we learn, live and lead.

The Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative is the leading incubator for innovation and new practice in business schools and for collaboration with business in the space of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability.

https://grli.org

  • About GRLI
  • Events
  • What’s important now
Global Responsibility
https://responsibility.global

Input your search keywords and press Enter.