Global Responsibility

Archives

  • Dec 2022
  • Oct 2022
  • Jun 2022
  • Apr 2022
  • Jan 2022
  • Dec 2021
  • Nov 2021
  • Oct 2021
  • Sep 2021
  • Jul 2021
  • May 2021
  • Mar 2021
  • Feb 2021
  • Dec 2020
  • Oct 2020
  • Sep 2020
  • Aug 2020
  • Jul 2020
  • Apr 2020
  • Mar 2020
  • Feb 2020
  • Jan 2020
  • Dec 2019
  • Nov 2019
  • Oct 2019
  • Sep 2019
  • Aug 2019
  • Jul 2019
  • May 2019
  • Feb 2019
  • Jan 2019
  • Dec 2018
  • Nov 2018
  • Oct 2018
  • Jul 2018
  • May 2018
  • Mar 2018
  • Nov 2017
  • Aug 2017
  • Jun 2017
  • May 2017
  • Apr 2017
  • Mar 2017
  • Feb 2017
  • Jan 2017
  • Oct 2016
  • Aug 2016
  • Jul 2016
  • May 2016
  • Apr 2016
  • Jan 2016
  • Oct 2015
  • Jun 2015
  • May 2015
  • Apr 2015
  • Mar 2015
  • Feb 2015
  • Nov 2014
  • Sep 2014
  • Aug 2014
  • Jun 2014
  • Apr 2014
  • Sep 2013
  • Jul 2013
  • Jun 2013
  • May 2013
  • Mar 2013
  • Jan 2013
  • Nov 2012
  • Oct 2012
  • Sep 2012
  • Jul 2012
  • Jun 2012
  • May 2012
  • Mar 2012
  • Feb 2012
  • Jan 2012
  • Aug 2011

Categories

  • Blog
Subscribe
Global Responsibility
Global Responsibility
  • Visit GRLI Website
  • Blog

Why are students our de facto public intellectuals?

  • 8 May 2012
  • 3 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

In late 2011 seventy economics students walked out of their professor’s class in order to draw attention to the course’s neoliberal inclinations and perceive short-sighted approach. The walkout raises questions around the relative scarcity of public intellectuals who are willing and / or able to discuss inherent problems in current economic practice. Students themselves may increasingly become our de facto public intellectuals — creating a headache in academic institutions that are traditionally too slow to adapt to changing economic and social climate.

In November 2011 an open letter was sent to Greg Mankiw by the organizers of the Economics 10 walkout who are closely affiliated with the Occupy movement.

The letter describes how, “as Harvard undergraduates, we enrolled in Economics 10 hoping to gain a broad and introductory foundation of economic theory that would assist us in our various intellectual pursuits and diverse disciplines, which range from Economics, to Government, to Environmental Sciences and Public Policy, and beyond. Instead, we found a course that espouses a specific — and limited — view of economics that we believe perpetuates problematic and inefficient systems of economic inequality in our society today.”

The incident has sparked a great deal of debate around the intentions of the students and the perceived failings of academia. Economics-focused media organizations showed mixed reactions, ranging from hostility and sympathetic indulgence. Bloomberg, for example, wrote how:

“Economics 10 is a defined and therefore limited course. As taught by Mankiw, a great talent, it conveys modern macro- and microeconomics mostly through the prism of capitalism, rather than through socialism or communism. It’s also true that there is a gap in the U.S. between rich and poor; although whether that’s a problem per se has to be debated. Third, and most important, macroeconomic theory did fail to predict the most recent recession. At Harvard in 2007, many professors and students took for granted that we were in an era of “great moderation, ” and that life should henceforth progress smoothly down the decades.”

Perhaps more interesting than the walkout itself is the wide support it has enjoyed from the general public. Public response was largely supportive of the walkout, many of whom added very useful insights:

“Higher academia is rife with intellectual dishonesty. Our system has basically gone from educating (somewhat) to indoctrinating young people on whom we depend to make pragmatic choices. Where are the case studies on the enclosure movements and their impact on urbanization, the maritime commerce industry wages, urban growth, interest rates across the significant cities of the time (Antwerp, London, Goa, Paris, Lisbon, Madrid). Where is the study on currency itself? We are still taught that money, even though sardonically referred to as a “tool of exchange” has a value in and of itself without elaborating on the subject of real value of money much beyond the topics of inflation, deflation, and central banking. Where is the study on central banking itself — its history, its successes and failings, and its moral hazards. It’s not there. These kids seem to understand that. Good for them.” (Reikoku Jaken)

A slightly more conciliatory poster wrote:

“I think some of the posters are being a little harsh on the students. Youth and idealism have prevailed throughout history without regard to financial wealth or the lack thereof. Additionally, university professors are notorious for presenting one-sided ideas, whether they be liberal views or conservative. A true educator inspires students and ignites curiosity to expand knowledge beyond textbooks. Perhaps Mankiw is a true educator because he inspired his students to take action. Hopefully he has enough wisdom to not fail the students.” (Patti OPinion)

Whilst the details of what exactly should be taught in introductory courses is an important matter, the walkout raises larger questions: where were the academia-trained public intellectuals who should have led such a movement in the first place? Where are the individuals — the public bridges — who could have raised these concerns long ago? Why did the walkout spark such media interest and enjoy so much public support?

Either way, it seems that young people are becoming increasingly aware of the problems caused by the present economic system. They are beginning to think beyond what they read in their textbooks — and are not afraid to express their concerns in the public domain.

That should be a comfort to us all.

Total
0
Shares
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Previous Article
  • Blog

Tim “Mac” Macartney introduces the “Children’s Fire”

  • 11 Mar 2012
View Post
Next Article
  • Blog

What kind of world do you want to live in?

  • 13 May 2012
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Blog

A message from our Chair

  • The GRLI
  • 9 Dec 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?

  • The GRLI
  • 12 Oct 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members

  • The GRLI
  • 26 Jun 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference

  • John North
  • 1 Apr 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Teaching Responsible Leadership, Moral Imagination and Stakeholder Dilemma Reconciliation:

  • The GRLI
  • 26 Jan 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Message from GRLI Foundation Chair Claire Maxwell

  • The GRLI
  • 21 Dec 2021
View Post
  • Blog

What Transformation Catalysts Do to Catalyze System Change

  • The GRLI
  • 24 Nov 2021
View Post
  • Blog

Teaching Responsible Leadership and Inclusion: Gram Vikas

  • The GRLI
  • 24 Nov 2021
Featured Posts
  • A message from our Chair
    • 9 Dec 2022
  • Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?
    • 12 Oct 2022
  • A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members
    • 26 Jun 2022
  • Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference
    • 1 Apr 2022
  • Teaching Responsible Leadership, Moral Imagination and Stakeholder Dilemma Reconciliation:
    • 26 Jan 2022

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

The Global Responsibility blog hosted by the GRLI provides a record of the ongoing collaborative inquiry into the development of global responsibility in how we learn, live and lead.

The Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative is the leading incubator for innovation and new practice in business schools and for collaboration with business in the space of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability.

https://grli.org

  • About GRLI
  • Events
  • What’s important now
Global Responsibility
https://responsibility.global

Input your search keywords and press Enter.