Global Responsibility

Archives

  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • August 2011

Categories

  • Blog
Subscribe
Global Responsibility
Global Responsibility
  • Visit GRLI Website
  • Blog

Towns and schools in transition

  • 15 October 2012
  • 4 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

The world cannot be changed with a single grandiose epiphany. A one-size-fits-all solution would be dangerous and highly prone to failure. Rather, we propose a process of engagement which provides participants with the freedom and flexibility to begin where their organization is currently placed, leaving open how they wish to implement concrete actions. Actors in management education will undoubtedly choose different paths and produce variable approaches that depend heavily on their missions, strategies, and circumstances.

A useful starting point to implement change is to examine an institution as it exists today and bring together the people involved, including students, academics, administrators, business people, NGOs and government representatives. Together, such a group can explore how to turn the vision into action. The process may produce a number of outcomes, such as momentum to change the institution, to combine with others to change the system, or individual actions.

Many parts of society interact with the field of management education in more than one way:

  • Governments may fund, license and accredit, utilize the knowledge created and send their employees to training courses.
  • Large corporations may sponsor, endow, pay for student bursaries, buy executive education, recruit graduates, fund research, hire consultants or sell goods and services to institutes of management education.
  • Students and their parents or friends may select a university or program, voice their demand for certain courses or competences.
  • Accreditation bodies decide on which criteria and standards schools are measured and evaluated, media organizations report on the industry and issue annual ratings and rankings based on criteria of their choice.
  • Policy makers, influencers across social media, alumni, donors and investors can choose which of the players they are supporting.

From Transition Town to transition business schools

There are various different approaches and solutions for each group of stakeholders. Depending on the region, each player within a stakeholder group will identify different solutions that are appropriate and adequate locally or regionally. We hold no assumptions of knowing what is right for others and therefore prefer to suggest a process, rather than solutions that may at best come across presumptuous or naïve, or both. Rather, we propose a process of engagement that allows each stakeholder to start at the exact point where his organization is right now, leaving it open just how far a stakeholder wants to go in testing options and implementing concrete actions.

The Transition Town process offers an excellent example of how a wide range of members of a community can engage in a change process that would be too complex for any single one player or organization. The goal of the Transition Town movement is to mobilize communities, town and cities to transition towards a low carbon future. The movement quickly realized that the key to success is less in providing endless lists of detailed recommendations but to develop and provide a method that enables anyone to initiate such a change in his community. We cannot overemphasize our goal to ignite the desire of anybody in the large community touched by business and management education to self create and act on turning this vision into action at all levels: personal, institutional and systemic.

We would like to find a way to bring together people who are willing and able to engage in these different levels in order to co-create a different future together. The Transition Town movement supplies a simple, yet powerful process of engagement which includes five stages:

  1. Starting out: take initiative by moving from idea to action
  2. Deepening: Initiative gains momentum as practical projects emerge
  3. Connecting: Initiatives are linked to other role players and elements thus infusing systems-wide awareness
  4. Building: Initiatives and projects act and think much bigger. Projects become full-on enterprises.
  5. Daring to dream: Taking transition thinking and action to the next level — industry, nation, globe.

The key learning from this process is its pragmatic perspective on the creation aspect, providing an advanced framework to the old “forming, storming, norming, conforming, performing” paradigm of teams that may work well in an institutional framework but have clear limitations in a setting that builds on voluntary engagement. Pentland at MIT provides ground-breaking insights into how patterns of communication predict the success of teams, demystifying the chemistry of high-performing groups and opening new perspectives on how to collaborate effectively.

We need to be careful not to get wrapped up in “bolt on” solutions that serve as quick fixes in the current system; instead, we need to focus on the deep change needed to ensure that the change is “built in”. We need deep change rather than a superficial increase in a number of seemingly related activities. We anticipate that creating built-in solutions might be as challenging for our stakeholders as they are for us as players in the field. We suggest a process of engagement whereby we as players join forces with our extended stakeholders in order for all of us to become members in a community of co-learners in an adventure of a road less traveled.

Total
0
Shares
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Previous Article
  • Blog

A new generation of teachers and researchers

  • 9 October 2012
View Post
Next Article
  • Blog

Preview: RIO+20 Documentary to be launched at Africa Leads 2012

  • 7 November 2012
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Blog

 Peter Møllgaard appointed chair of the GRLI

  • The GRLI
  • 15 July 2023
View Post
  • Blog

A message from our Chair

  • The GRLI
  • 9 December 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?

  • The GRLI
  • 12 October 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members

  • The GRLI
  • 26 June 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference

  • John North
  • 1 April 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Teaching Responsible Leadership, Moral Imagination and Stakeholder Dilemma Reconciliation:

  • The GRLI
  • 26 January 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Message from GRLI Foundation Chair Claire Maxwell

  • The GRLI
  • 21 December 2021
View Post
  • Blog

What Transformation Catalysts Do to Catalyze System Change

  • The GRLI
  • 24 November 2021
Featured Posts
  •  Peter Møllgaard appointed chair of the GRLI
    • 15 July 2023
  • A message from our Chair
    • 9 December 2022
  • Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?
    • 12 October 2022
  • A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members
    • 26 June 2022
  • Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference
    • 1 April 2022

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

The Global Responsibility blog hosted by the GRLI provides a record of the ongoing collaborative inquiry into the development of global responsibility in how we learn, live and lead.

The Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative is the leading incubator for innovation and new practice in business schools and for collaboration with business in the space of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability.

https://grli.org

  • About GRLI
  • Events
  • What’s important now
Global Responsibility
https://responsibility.global

Input your search keywords and press Enter.