Global Responsibility

Archives

  • Dec 2022
  • Oct 2022
  • Jun 2022
  • Apr 2022
  • Jan 2022
  • Dec 2021
  • Nov 2021
  • Oct 2021
  • Sep 2021
  • Jul 2021
  • May 2021
  • Mar 2021
  • Feb 2021
  • Dec 2020
  • Oct 2020
  • Sep 2020
  • Aug 2020
  • Jul 2020
  • Apr 2020
  • Mar 2020
  • Feb 2020
  • Jan 2020
  • Dec 2019
  • Nov 2019
  • Oct 2019
  • Sep 2019
  • Aug 2019
  • Jul 2019
  • May 2019
  • Feb 2019
  • Jan 2019
  • Dec 2018
  • Nov 2018
  • Oct 2018
  • Jul 2018
  • May 2018
  • Mar 2018
  • Nov 2017
  • Aug 2017
  • Jun 2017
  • May 2017
  • Apr 2017
  • Mar 2017
  • Feb 2017
  • Jan 2017
  • Oct 2016
  • Aug 2016
  • Jul 2016
  • May 2016
  • Apr 2016
  • Jan 2016
  • Oct 2015
  • Jun 2015
  • May 2015
  • Apr 2015
  • Mar 2015
  • Feb 2015
  • Nov 2014
  • Sep 2014
  • Aug 2014
  • Jun 2014
  • Apr 2014
  • Sep 2013
  • Jul 2013
  • Jun 2013
  • May 2013
  • Mar 2013
  • Jan 2013
  • Nov 2012
  • Oct 2012
  • Sep 2012
  • Jul 2012
  • Jun 2012
  • May 2012
  • Mar 2012
  • Feb 2012
  • Jan 2012
  • Aug 2011

Categories

  • Blog
Subscribe
Global Responsibility
Global Responsibility
  • Visit GRLI Website
  • Blog

Three dimensional learning

  • 23 May 2017
  • 6 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
 I, WE and ALL OF US, a pedagogy for sustainability and responsibility

Carlo Giardinetti, a GRLI Guardian and “educational hero” at Business School Lausanne, is fully engaged in transforming business into a “force for good”​. In this article he explores how to create a fully engaged community of learners.

Are you interested in having your community of learners fully engaged? A good start could be to spell out the purpose of the education you want to be part of.

For us at Business School Lausanne (BSL) the purpose of education is to support and foster responsible leadership and sustainable business. Responsibility and sustainability are in no way similar to the typical functional business and management education areas such as finance, marketing, human resources, strategy, operations or others. In fact they add a layer of learning — even more than a layer. You can think of it as part of the DNA of the learning. How can you learn about business and management if you want responsibility and sustainability to be in the DNA of the learning you design?

I think most of us have experienced some great learning in our life. If such learning has stayed with you for a long time,and has somehow helped your transformation, evolution and/or development, it may well have been what I call three-dimensional learning. The three dimensions I am talking about are the I, WE and ALL OF US. What does this mean?

I, We, All of Us — the three ellipses of the GRLI logo.

It means that transformational learning can only happen when we discover how what we are learning is connected to the three dimensions:

The I — How is this relevant to me? What are my own struggles with the topic? What is my emotional connection to it? Do I have personal experiences?

The WE — Who are the main stakeholders related to the topic? What is their perspective? What do they know and how do they use their knowledge? Are there competing or collaborating views, or both? How do I work with them so that there is not them, but only we?

The ALL OF US — What is the systemic use and impact of the topic? What scenarios does the topic create? How does it impact our world in some or all four dimensions — planet, society, economy and governance?

Learners that are taken through the three dimensions develop a comprehensive understanding of the topic from the systemic level (ALL OF US) down to the personal relevance (I), through the application in the relevant communities (WE).

Learning through the I dimension ensures that the learner explores and uncovers the areas of personal relevance of the topic. Here some suggestions for learning designers/facilitators who want to ensure a good dive into the I space:

  • Using blocks of three or more hours of learning experience ensures the right variety of activities can take place, including reflective spaces.
  • Being a role model in the “I” space and finding the balance with neutral facilitating energy.
  • Organizing regular self-awareness gatherings for faculty and students (breakfasts, lunches, drinks, walks, etc.)
  • Circle sharing of personal check-in into the session/lecture/course with questions like:” What do I expect from this session?” (one minute per person).
  • Trio-walks where oneperson in the middle has five minutes to share his/her personal reflections around the topic and two people on the side are listening and providing two minutes of feedback each (total 10 minutes).
  • Pair talks around deep questions where strangers get to know something very meaningful about the other (15 mins each). Each will then present the other in front of the audience (up to 90 minutes).
  • Speed dating with a few personal questions with one minute per exchange (30 mins)
  • Journalling activities to support acknowledgment of learning and walk-aways (ongoing).
  • Storytelling where a person stands in front of a semi-circle and shares an insightful personal story around the topic (10 minutes per story + 10 minutes Q&A).
  • Group brainstorming using post-it to gather what each individual expects to learn and then cluster learning macro-areas.
  • MANY OTHERS!!!

Learning through the WE dimension ensures that the learner understands the complexity of the topic by exploring the different interests and perspectives of the multiple stakeholders relevant to the topic. The learner also understands the optimal ways to interact in the community. Here some suggestions:

  • Role play, where each group of three learners must impersonate the role of one different stakeholder. 1 hour is dedicated to researching key information to understand the crucial points of this stakeholder perspective. The facilitator uses the following hour to host and moderate a debate around key targeted questions among the stakeholders. Finally an additional hour is dedicated to reflection activities and harvesting the complexity of the topic. (three hours)
  • World café with different tables for different stakeholder perspectives, and teams rotating to ensure maximum contribution and learning from the different perspectives.
  • Running Collaboratory dialogues inviting different representatives from all the various stakeholders.
  • Certainly this is the space where business is learnt from a customer perspective, service provider, product manufacturer and so on. Most of the more “traditional” learning happens in this space
  • Business simulation, gamification, etc.
  • MANY OTHERS!!!

Learning through the ALL OF US dimension ensures the learner can see the systemic dynamics that the topic triggers. Dimensions like planet, society, economy and governance are explored in their interconnections and relevance to the topic. Typical activities that a facilitator can run include:

  • Watching documentaries that beautifully show the complexity and interconnections of our world.
  • Working with interactive scenario simulations.
  • Connecting via Skype or other platforms with other learners from very different areas of the world where the topic is experienced in radically different ways and exchange experiences in forms of reciprocal questions.
  • Using Issue Centered Learning where the starting topic is always a major issue of the world that can be picked, such as www.gapframe.org, a very useful tool we developed at BSL. Learners are then invited to explore their personal connection with the issue. Business is then looked at as being part of the solution and/or part of the problem. Functions of business and management are then identified as instrumental to drive the shift from being part of the problem to being part of the solution. Business is then understood and appreciated for what it is, an incredible generator of solutions and — unfortunately too often, problems.
  • MANY OTHERS!!!

Clearly all the above introduced dimensions and activities can be complemented with other forms of active and passive learning. Expert views and lectures can and should still happen but should be well integrated in the three dimensions and serve the broader purpose of each dimension. When designing learning spaces you can start thinking of different roles that should be present in the space. For instance:

  • The Expert. These can be faculty, researchers, entrepreneurs, citizens, or students who have a deep expertise relevant to the topic.
  • The Facilitator. These are skilled facilitators who can ensure learning continue to evolve from activity to activity in the best possible self-organized way. Facilitators refrain from interfering with opinions and expertise: it is not their role.
  • The Coach. Learning happens so differently within all of us and often encounters barriers on its way. Coaches can be peer learners who have simply earned some skills to support others in their individual learning journeys. Coaching is about asking the right questions in these cases, and also offering a listening partner.
  • The Participant. You can think of this category as the one closer to the typical student. Yet, there is no way a participant would be engaged in passive learning. Learning is participative and contribution is expected. The great opportunity is that participant can switch to coach, to facilitator or to expert at any given opportune time.

So, how do you feel, having read this? Did it move something inside you? Do you also think it is time and it is possible to redesign modern learning spaces that can help us to take care of ourselves and our beloved world? If you are curious to know more and join a vision for a new business and management education, go and visit www.50plus20.org.

Let me know what you think and I would love to engage in conversations around reinventing education together.

Total
0
Shares
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Previous Article
  • Blog

Five key elements of responsible leadership

  • 16 May 2017
View Post
Next Article
  • Blog

Quantum Leadership — A Primer

  • 25 May 2017
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Blog

A message from our Chair

  • The GRLI
  • 9 Dec 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?

  • The GRLI
  • 12 Oct 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members

  • The GRLI
  • 26 Jun 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference

  • John North
  • 1 Apr 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Teaching Responsible Leadership, Moral Imagination and Stakeholder Dilemma Reconciliation:

  • The GRLI
  • 26 Jan 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Message from GRLI Foundation Chair Claire Maxwell

  • The GRLI
  • 21 Dec 2021
View Post
  • Blog

What Transformation Catalysts Do to Catalyze System Change

  • The GRLI
  • 24 Nov 2021
View Post
  • Blog

Teaching Responsible Leadership and Inclusion: Gram Vikas

  • The GRLI
  • 24 Nov 2021
Featured Posts
  • A message from our Chair
    • 9 Dec 2022
  • Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?
    • 12 Oct 2022
  • A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members
    • 26 Jun 2022
  • Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference
    • 1 Apr 2022
  • Teaching Responsible Leadership, Moral Imagination and Stakeholder Dilemma Reconciliation:
    • 26 Jan 2022

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

The Global Responsibility blog hosted by the GRLI provides a record of the ongoing collaborative inquiry into the development of global responsibility in how we learn, live and lead.

The Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative is the leading incubator for innovation and new practice in business schools and for collaboration with business in the space of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability.

https://grli.org

  • About GRLI
  • Events
  • What’s important now
Global Responsibility
https://responsibility.global

Input your search keywords and press Enter.