Global Responsibility

Archives

  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • March 2024
  • December 2023
  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • August 2011

Categories

  • Blog
  • Tipping Point
Subscribe
Global Responsibility
Global Responsibility
  • Visit GRLI Website
  • Blog

Assessing Linkages On Purpose, Sustainability, and Responsibility

  • 13 December 2018
  • 4 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
Part 4: Culture of Purpose

Victoria Hurth is Associate Professor in Marketing & Sustainable Business and Faculty of Business Lead: Student Satisfaction at the University of Plymouth in the United Kingdom.

Editor’s Note: This is the fourth of a 5-part series on the interconnected linkages between purpose, governance, marketing, a culture of purpose, and leadership as they relate to sustainability and the GRLI’s broader inquiry into global responsibility. Read Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 5, or access the full series.

As an academic, definitions and measurements are two interdependent things I spend a lot of time thinking about. When thinking about how to measure a purpose-driven organisation, many conclude that it can’t be measured, or that measurement will restrict the progress of purpose. I think we need to be clear that there are at least two types of measurement we could be talking about here. Firstly, once the organisational purpose has been set (see my earlier blog on this) a company will articulate its mission and associated objectives, strategy, and KPIs (ideally within a balanced scorecard or other way of creating an integrated report around the impact on the purpose). This is in the realm of classic strategic management and the KPIs will usually measure the success of the strategy the business decides is the best way to deliver purpose at that point in time. This is likely to be highly specific to a strategy/business so the suite used cannot be standardised.

At the same time, KPIs may be common within a business. There is also likely to be much commonality across sectors and even across all organisations (e.g. when considering carbon impacts or impact on people’s self-esteem). In this way the work of the GRI, ISO, UNCTAD and others who work in the space of methodological standardisation is vital as it enables benchmarking and rankings to be as valid as possible — thereby aiding the accountability process so vital to good governance. So, whereas the first kind of measurement is about strategic outcomes, a second kind of measurement is about understanding if a culture of purpose has been created. Much of the positive benefits of purpose for an organisation accrue due to the shift in the organisational culture. Often cited outcomes of purpose on higher productivity, lower stress, lower attrition, higher customer focus etc. are all about the effect on employees of an organisation that has the clarity and motivation of meaningful direction.

It is this second area of measurement that I feel deserves a lot more attention. Not long after starting the research on purpose with my Cambridge colleagues, we began working closely with John Rosling from Contexis who had been thinking about this for some time. He and his colleagues had observed entrepreneurial companies over a 15-year period and realised that purpose was absolutely core to whether or not a company was high performing. They also observed that there were a range of cultural attributes that seemed to explain whether or not a declared purpose was actually activated in the DNA of the organisation or remained a nice statement. They came to us wanting to test whether or not their observations were correct and develop interventions that could identify where the blockage was and help address it. What John and colleagues had put their finger on was a way of testing whether purpose was living and breathing throughout the organisation and a means to start pinning down where the issues and blockages were. By addressing this, purpose can be allowed to come to life and as a result the identified performance benefits of purpose can be more easily realised. We have worked with Contexis to develop their purpose index (which includes a soon to be updated measure of organisational purpose taken from our definition). This utilises the best academic scales available to assess the cultural attributes John and colleagues identified — everything from trust, ownership and context clarity, to engagement, creativity and organisational velocity. The job now is to scale how many companies take and benefit from the test and to start properly testing what drives purpose.

The index contributes to Contexis’ own purpose by pulling together an extensive range of data across organisations and sectors so that the whole business community can have a much deeper and nuanced understanding of purpose. For this reason, Contexis want to make the survey low cost (depending on the organisational scale and complexity) for any company to take, and the Universities of Cambridge and Plymouth are contributing time to supporting this and analysing the data. If anyone would like to know more about the survey and how they can get involved in taking it then John is the person to speak to. We are also developing a robust scale to measure purpose based on our definition (see the first in this blog series), please contact Charlie Ebert who is spearheading this as part of his PhD if you want to know more.

Read Part 5: Leadership.


Victoria Hurth

Victoria Hurth is Associate Professor in Marketing & Sustainable Business and Faculty of Business Lead: Student Satisfaction at Plymouth University in the United Kingdom.

Reach Victoria at victoria.hurth@plymouth.ac.uk and follow her on Twitter at @VictoriaHurth.

Total
0
Shares
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Previous Article
  • Blog

Letting Go to Let Come

  • 7 December 2018
View Post
Next Article
  • Blog

Hope leads to action, action to hope

  • 18 December 2018
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Blog

Leadership in Uncertain Times : Exploring the Interplay Between Crisis, Power and Systemic Transformation

  • Darija Miletic
  • 2 October 2024
View Post
  • Blog
  • Tipping Point

Advancing Globally Responsible Management Education: A travelling collaborative inquiry

  • Darija Miletic
  • 21 August 2024
View Post
  • Blog

Exploring the Essence of Global Responsibility: Join GRLI Crucial Conversations

  • John North
  • 2 August 2024
View Post
  • Blog

12 ways to start decolonizing business schools

  • The GRLI
  • 12 March 2024
View Post
  • Blog

Reflecting on our Crucial Conversations

  • The GRLI
  • 10 March 2024
View Post
  • Blog

Transpersonal Leadership Deep Dive

  • The GRLI
  • 15 December 2023
View Post
  • Blog

Our 2023 wrapped up

  • The GRLI
  • 15 December 2023
View Post
  • Blog

 Peter Møllgaard appointed chair of the GRLI

  • The GRLI
  • 15 July 2023
Featured Posts
  • Leadership in Uncertain Times : Exploring the Interplay Between Crisis, Power and Systemic Transformation
    • 2 October 2024
  • Transforming Marketing Courses – Lessons Learned
    • 17 September 2024
  • Advancing Globally Responsible Management Education: A travelling collaborative inquiry
    • 21 August 2024
  • Exploring the Essence of Global Responsibility: Join GRLI Crucial Conversations
    • 2 August 2024
  • 12 ways to start decolonizing business schools
    • 12 March 2024

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

The Global Responsibility blog hosted by the GRLI provides a record of the ongoing collaborative inquiry into the development of global responsibility in how we learn, live and lead.

The Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative is the leading incubator for innovation and new practice in business schools and for collaboration with business in the space of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability.

https://grli.org

  • About GRLI
  • Events
  • What’s important now
Global Responsibility
https://responsibility.global

Input your search keywords and press Enter.