Global Responsibility

Archives

  • Dec 2022
  • Oct 2022
  • Jun 2022
  • Apr 2022
  • Jan 2022
  • Dec 2021
  • Nov 2021
  • Oct 2021
  • Sep 2021
  • Jul 2021
  • May 2021
  • Mar 2021
  • Feb 2021
  • Dec 2020
  • Oct 2020
  • Sep 2020
  • Aug 2020
  • Jul 2020
  • Apr 2020
  • Mar 2020
  • Feb 2020
  • Jan 2020
  • Dec 2019
  • Nov 2019
  • Oct 2019
  • Sep 2019
  • Aug 2019
  • Jul 2019
  • May 2019
  • Feb 2019
  • Jan 2019
  • Dec 2018
  • Nov 2018
  • Oct 2018
  • Jul 2018
  • May 2018
  • Mar 2018
  • Nov 2017
  • Aug 2017
  • Jun 2017
  • May 2017
  • Apr 2017
  • Mar 2017
  • Feb 2017
  • Jan 2017
  • Oct 2016
  • Aug 2016
  • Jul 2016
  • May 2016
  • Apr 2016
  • Jan 2016
  • Oct 2015
  • Jun 2015
  • May 2015
  • Apr 2015
  • Mar 2015
  • Feb 2015
  • Nov 2014
  • Sep 2014
  • Aug 2014
  • Jun 2014
  • Apr 2014
  • Sep 2013
  • Jul 2013
  • Jun 2013
  • May 2013
  • Mar 2013
  • Jan 2013
  • Nov 2012
  • Oct 2012
  • Sep 2012
  • Jul 2012
  • Jun 2012
  • May 2012
  • Mar 2012
  • Feb 2012
  • Jan 2012
  • Aug 2011

Categories

  • Blog
Subscribe
Global Responsibility
Global Responsibility
  • Visit GRLI Website
  • Blog

Assessing Linkages On Purpose, Sustainability, and Responsibility

  • 13 Dec 2018
  • 4 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
Part 4: Culture of Purpose

Victoria Hurth is Associate Professor in Marketing & Sustainable Business and Faculty of Business Lead: Student Satisfaction at the University of Plymouth in the United Kingdom.

Editor’s Note: This is the fourth of a 5-part series on the interconnected linkages between purpose, governance, marketing, a culture of purpose, and leadership as they relate to sustainability and the GRLI’s broader inquiry into global responsibility. Read Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 and Part 5, or access the full series.

As an academic, definitions and measurements are two interdependent things I spend a lot of time thinking about. When thinking about how to measure a purpose-driven organisation, many conclude that it can’t be measured, or that measurement will restrict the progress of purpose. I think we need to be clear that there are at least two types of measurement we could be talking about here. Firstly, once the organisational purpose has been set (see my earlier blog on this) a company will articulate its mission and associated objectives, strategy, and KPIs (ideally within a balanced scorecard or other way of creating an integrated report around the impact on the purpose). This is in the realm of classic strategic management and the KPIs will usually measure the success of the strategy the business decides is the best way to deliver purpose at that point in time. This is likely to be highly specific to a strategy/business so the suite used cannot be standardised.

At the same time, KPIs may be common within a business. There is also likely to be much commonality across sectors and even across all organisations (e.g. when considering carbon impacts or impact on people’s self-esteem). In this way the work of the GRI, ISO, UNCTAD and others who work in the space of methodological standardisation is vital as it enables benchmarking and rankings to be as valid as possible — thereby aiding the accountability process so vital to good governance. So, whereas the first kind of measurement is about strategic outcomes, a second kind of measurement is about understanding if a culture of purpose has been created. Much of the positive benefits of purpose for an organisation accrue due to the shift in the organisational culture. Often cited outcomes of purpose on higher productivity, lower stress, lower attrition, higher customer focus etc. are all about the effect on employees of an organisation that has the clarity and motivation of meaningful direction.

It is this second area of measurement that I feel deserves a lot more attention. Not long after starting the research on purpose with my Cambridge colleagues, we began working closely with John Rosling from Contexis who had been thinking about this for some time. He and his colleagues had observed entrepreneurial companies over a 15-year period and realised that purpose was absolutely core to whether or not a company was high performing. They also observed that there were a range of cultural attributes that seemed to explain whether or not a declared purpose was actually activated in the DNA of the organisation or remained a nice statement. They came to us wanting to test whether or not their observations were correct and develop interventions that could identify where the blockage was and help address it. What John and colleagues had put their finger on was a way of testing whether purpose was living and breathing throughout the organisation and a means to start pinning down where the issues and blockages were. By addressing this, purpose can be allowed to come to life and as a result the identified performance benefits of purpose can be more easily realised. We have worked with Contexis to develop their purpose index (which includes a soon to be updated measure of organisational purpose taken from our definition). This utilises the best academic scales available to assess the cultural attributes John and colleagues identified — everything from trust, ownership and context clarity, to engagement, creativity and organisational velocity. The job now is to scale how many companies take and benefit from the test and to start properly testing what drives purpose.

The index contributes to Contexis’ own purpose by pulling together an extensive range of data across organisations and sectors so that the whole business community can have a much deeper and nuanced understanding of purpose. For this reason, Contexis want to make the survey low cost (depending on the organisational scale and complexity) for any company to take, and the Universities of Cambridge and Plymouth are contributing time to supporting this and analysing the data. If anyone would like to know more about the survey and how they can get involved in taking it then John is the person to speak to. We are also developing a robust scale to measure purpose based on our definition (see the first in this blog series), please contact Charlie Ebert who is spearheading this as part of his PhD if you want to know more.

Read Part 5: Leadership.


Victoria Hurth

Victoria Hurth is Associate Professor in Marketing & Sustainable Business and Faculty of Business Lead: Student Satisfaction at Plymouth University in the United Kingdom.

Reach Victoria at victoria.hurth@plymouth.ac.uk and follow her on Twitter at @VictoriaHurth.

Total
0
Shares
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Previous Article
  • Blog

Letting Go to Let Come

  • 7 Dec 2018
View Post
Next Article
  • Blog

Hope leads to action, action to hope

  • 18 Dec 2018
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Blog

A message from our Chair

  • The GRLI
  • 9 Dec 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?

  • The GRLI
  • 12 Oct 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members

  • The GRLI
  • 26 Jun 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference

  • John North
  • 1 Apr 2022
View Post
  • Blog

Teaching Responsible Leadership, Moral Imagination and Stakeholder Dilemma Reconciliation:

  • The GRLI
  • 26 Jan 2022
View Post
  • Blog

A Message from GRLI Foundation Chair Claire Maxwell

  • The GRLI
  • 21 Dec 2021
View Post
  • Blog

What Transformation Catalysts Do to Catalyze System Change

  • The GRLI
  • 24 Nov 2021
View Post
  • Blog

Teaching Responsible Leadership and Inclusion: Gram Vikas

  • The GRLI
  • 24 Nov 2021
Featured Posts
  • A message from our Chair
    • 9 Dec 2022
  • Is insistence on growth the elephant in the room?
    • 12 Oct 2022
  • A Call to Prospective GRLI Guardians and Board Members
    • 26 Jun 2022
  • Outcomes: Responsible Leadership Reimagined Conference
    • 1 Apr 2022
  • Teaching Responsible Leadership, Moral Imagination and Stakeholder Dilemma Reconciliation:
    • 26 Jan 2022

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

The Global Responsibility blog hosted by the GRLI provides a record of the ongoing collaborative inquiry into the development of global responsibility in how we learn, live and lead.

The Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative is the leading incubator for innovation and new practice in business schools and for collaboration with business in the space of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability.

https://grli.org

  • About GRLI
  • Events
  • What’s important now
Global Responsibility
https://responsibility.global

Input your search keywords and press Enter.