Global Responsibility

Archives

  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • March 2024
  • December 2023
  • July 2023
  • December 2022
  • October 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • March 2018
  • November 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • October 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • January 2016
  • October 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • August 2011

Categories

  • Blog
  • Tipping Point
Subscribe
Global Responsibility
Global Responsibility
  • Visit GRLI Website
  • Blog

Exploring a New Understanding of Responsible Leadership — Part 1

  • 22 August 2019
  • 7 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
Part 1 of 3 introducing research that shifts the focus from the individual leader, to leader relations

Anne Keränen is a management and international business researcher at the Martti Ahtisaari Institute, Oulu Business School, in Finland.

Editor’s Note: This is the first of a three-part series where business researcher Anne Keränen shares her doctoral thesis with the GRLI network , which radically shifted the focus from individual leaders to leader relations. It brings to the forefront the importance of understanding leadership as a shared phenomenon, and as a medium for responsibility integration in business. Within the framework of changing business practice, this perspective can lead to new business change theories, ideas and practices. In this three-part series, Anne explains her proposed approach to leadership as a social construction process, expanding focus from the qualities and competencies of individual leaders to a wider perspective — and why the narrative environment of leadership is important. 

Conventional vs. responsible leadership theories

In considering leadership, theories of responsible leadership are distinct from conventional views. They are distinguished from conventional leadership by two key factors, namely stakeholders and leadership targets.

Stakeholders

The responsible leadership theory differs from conventional leadership theories in that responsible leadership emphasises the meaning of stakeholders, and the different stakeholders that leaders need to be aware of and consider when making decisions. Traditional leadership theories are more focused on the leader and his or her subordinates, and this one-dimensional interaction between leader and subordinate, and the communication and relationship that result from this interaction.

On the opposite end, the responsible leadership theory has a wider perspective than this. It advocates that because of the change in business context, leaders need to be considering the needs and viewpoints of different stakeholders, such as employees, customers, sector organisations and the environment.

Under the realm of responsible leadership, the leader adapts to a changing context. There is no longer an internal focus on the leader, but a wider external focus, not only recognising but also strongly emphasising all of the different stakeholders who may be involved in different ways and contexts.

Target

The aim or target of earlier leadership theories was a result of the traditional leadership perspective, guided by the single leader-centric process of traditional leadership. However, the responsible leadership theory considers the target differently. It builds from the premise that sustainable development — a common societal good — is the target of responsible leadership.

These two aspects, namely stakeholders and the common societal and company-good target that it is heading towards, are central to the responsible leadership theory.

Integrating responsible leadership

The conventional application of leadership and leadership theories is still widely expected; so is the manifestation of this — such as a single heroic leader within a company. But integrating responsible leadership within a company will necessitate a much wider perspective. The change in these leadership theories will bring about the migrating from a ‘single-strong-man’ viewpoint to a ‘strong-group’ viewpoint.

However, this migration of leadership theories develops challenges for leaders. Conventionally, people are waiting for the strong leader to emerge, but integrating responsible leadership means that the responsible leader will need to act differently. The responsible leader may find him or herself constantly defending this novel approach within a long-established and accepted traditional context.

The traditional perspective challenges the integration of responsible leadership on the ground in many ways. For example, it highlights the short-term financial results and tough business leadership while responsibility may be achieved through more long-term orientated goals and team leadership. These challenges are limitations for companies, and have to be overcome for successful responsible leadership integration.

Shaping the responsible leader

There are many different aspects to what constitutes a responsible leader, and this is evident from identifying responsible leaders across disciplines and sectors. At the same time, there is no single approach to becoming a responsible leader. Building on the founding principles of responsible leadership, becoming a responsible leader advocates a high degree of personal influence and flexibility.

Personal influence is another factor. Anne says that one of the responsible leaders interviewed as part of her research simply awoke one day knowing that there was no turning back to the old ways. “The world has changed, and as a leader in business, I had to change too.” For some, it may be a pertinent happening that spurs responsible leadership; for others, it may be a process of maturing in understanding in action or it may be a societal context which induces a changed perspective. How we reach responsible leadership is not important. What is important is how it becomes ingrained in leaders, part of their being.

Responsible leaders are both mature yet they remain youthful in their readiness to experience new things. Anne found this sense of readiness as a commonality among all the leaders interviewed as part of her research. Neither is responsible leadership tied to age. A young leader can be a responsible leader, but so can an older leader.

This research took place within the Scandinavian context, and does not necessarily speak for the international environment. Responsible leaders from different sectors were interviewed across different companies and departments, from managing directors to directors of corporate social responsibility departments. The research included both men and women. The research group furthermore included different company types, including smaller, family-owned and operated companies, international companies as well as public and privately-owned companies. What it confirmed is that the responsible leader can come from almost any background.

Shifting focus from the individual leader to leader relations

It is important to shift the focus from the individual leader to leader relations, because the context of business, and therefore the context of leadership, has changed. Given the complexity of contemporary companies, it is nearly impossible for a single leader to be in complete control of a company as a whole. For this context, responsible leaders with strong stakeholder relations are needed.

It is increasingly recognised that work within companies is knowledge-based. Thinking about responsibility, there are many people within companies that are required to make decisions on a daily basis. And these are often complex decisions — involving ethics and sustainability. But chances are that if the leader includes several people within this decision-making process, there is greater surety that different points of view have been taken into account in reaching the decision.

How this shift responds to the challenges of formal change initiatives

The responsible leadership theory clearly responds to the challenges of formal change initiatives. Change programmes are known for failures, specifically because the top-down approach is commonly adopted for bridging change. Anne reminds that it is easy to get trapped in the technical front, forgetting about the people and whole personalities involved not only in the decision-making process, but also at the decision-making process end-point. Actively involving people should be at the centre of change programmes, helped along by responsible leadership.

There is a clear synergy between responsible leadership and change initiatives. Responsibility is about people, what motivates people and how people approach change. Hence the ‘people factor’ or the relations that flow from this, cannot be excluded from change initiatives.

Anne says her research has found that responsible leaders approach change by considering it a learning process: a process in which they, as responsible leaders, want to be at the centre of integration, aiming at targets together and from within a circular system of relational leadership and decision-making.

Change initiatives that are based on responsible leadership involve a degree of flexibility. To illustrate, Anne explains that with this approach, it is not the most fundamental point that all stakeholders within a company understand the company values in the same way or reach such an agreement, as there is a degree of interpretation flexibility. The key focus is rather on the leadership and decision-making processes, and approaching change as a learning process where values and the meaning of values in practice are discussed together to find solutions for any problem that arises while working towards the change targets.

Leading to a better understanding of responsibility integration in business

CSR, implementation instructions, codes of conduct — there are so many in place already, but still cases such as the 2015 Volkswagen malpractice occur. But responsible leadership, through its wider lens, balances the people process and quantitative target. The wider perspective of responsible leadership furthermore advocates responsible action at individual level. People are motivated to adopt responsibility throughout their personal and professional references. And this is a key opportunity for companies. There are many companies that operate well beyond greenwashing; responsible leadership recognise this and build on it as an encouraging framework.

Favourable narrative environment of responsible leadership

What is not so often talked about in respect of the responsibility narrative within companies is that this narrative is shaped through language: how we speak about responsibility throughout society, for example, in general media.

What should also be noted from a favourable narrative environment is that there is not a single leader — it is a matter of the whole. There are many role players, and the narrative is about them collectively. A favourable narrative environment is not a heroic scene, or a media generated set-up: it is about the context. More widely, it’s about who the stakeholders are, what roles they play, and how stakeholders such as customers and sector organisations can contribute to responsible leadership. Decisions are made all the time, and in a favourable narrative environment, perhaps we will not be as ready to judge the wrongs, but focus instead on improved outcomes or future prospects. And it links back to the maturity of the responsible leader: stepping beyond initial reaction, and looking deeper at the context and relations around.

From the understanding of relationship leadership to the construction process, Part 2 of this series will explore the responsible leadership construction process — what this means for business, how responsibility integration can be guided, and why informal relationships are equally important.


Anne Keränen

Anne Keränen is Responsible Leadership and HR Teacher/Specialist at the Martti Ahtisaari Institute, Oulu Business School, in Finland. Reach Anne at anne.keranen@oulu.fi and follow her on Twitter at @AnneMariaKerane.

Total
0
Shares
Tweet 0
Share 0
Share 0
Previous Article
  • Blog

Exploring a New Understanding of Responsible Leadership — Part 2

  • 22 August 2019
View Post
Next Article
  • Blog

What’s Important Now?

  • 27 August 2019
View Post
You May Also Like
View Post
  • Blog

Leadership in Uncertain Times : Exploring the Interplay Between Crisis, Power and Systemic Transformation

  • Darija Miletic
  • 2 October 2024
View Post
  • Blog
  • Tipping Point

Advancing Globally Responsible Management Education: A travelling collaborative inquiry

  • Darija Miletic
  • 21 August 2024
View Post
  • Blog

Exploring the Essence of Global Responsibility: Join GRLI Crucial Conversations

  • John North
  • 2 August 2024
View Post
  • Blog

12 ways to start decolonizing business schools

  • The GRLI
  • 12 March 2024
View Post
  • Blog

Reflecting on our Crucial Conversations

  • The GRLI
  • 10 March 2024
View Post
  • Blog

Transpersonal Leadership Deep Dive

  • The GRLI
  • 15 December 2023
View Post
  • Blog

Our 2023 wrapped up

  • The GRLI
  • 15 December 2023
View Post
  • Blog

 Peter Møllgaard appointed chair of the GRLI

  • The GRLI
  • 15 July 2023
Featured Posts
  • Leadership in Uncertain Times : Exploring the Interplay Between Crisis, Power and Systemic Transformation
    • 2 October 2024
  • Transforming Marketing Courses – Lessons Learned
    • 17 September 2024
  • Advancing Globally Responsible Management Education: A travelling collaborative inquiry
    • 21 August 2024
  • Exploring the Essence of Global Responsibility: Join GRLI Crucial Conversations
    • 2 August 2024
  • 12 ways to start decolonizing business schools
    • 12 March 2024

Subscribe

Subscribe now to our newsletter

The Global Responsibility blog hosted by the GRLI provides a record of the ongoing collaborative inquiry into the development of global responsibility in how we learn, live and lead.

The Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative is the leading incubator for innovation and new practice in business schools and for collaboration with business in the space of ethics, responsibility, and sustainability.

https://grli.org

  • About GRLI
  • Events
  • What’s important now
Global Responsibility
https://responsibility.global

Input your search keywords and press Enter.